Protesters flash the three finger salute while holding pictures of Myanmar democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi during a demonstration to mark the second anniversary of Myanmar's 2021 military coup, outside the Embassy of Myanmar, in Bangkok, Thailand. - EPA PIC
Protesters flash the three finger salute while holding pictures of Myanmar democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi during a demonstration to mark the second anniversary of Myanmar's 2021 military coup, outside the Embassy of Myanmar, in Bangkok, Thailand. - EPA PIC

Whether one likes to call it Myanmar or Burma, both expressions currently point to a failed state.

With more than 52 million people of various ethnic and religious backgrounds forced to comply with every dictate of the military junta of Senior General Myin Aung Hlaing, it is no wonder that the people have risen up against him and the Tatmadaw or military.

The cause of the junta began with the personal ambition of Aung Hlaing to be the president prior to his mandatory retirement in May 2021.

Yet, deprived of the chance to have the approval of the then state councillor or leader of the National League of Democracy (NLD), Aung Hlaing felt completely slighted.

The fact that the NLD has romped home to a major electoral victory in November 2020, this despite a pandemic that was fast unfolding all across the world and not just in Myanmar, made for an even more humiliating slap on the proverbial face of the senior general himself.

But, things perhaps would not have come to a boil had Aung San Suu Kyi intentionally not set out to deny any opportunity to have a face-to-face dialogue between the "Lady" and the "senior general".

The meeting that never occurred, to allow Aung Hlaing to explain to Suu Kyi that the Tatmadaw not only wanted the presidency but full control of the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Borders and the Ministry of Public Security, further destroyed any chance of a peaceful dialogue both before and after the coup of Feb 1, 2021, which the world has roundly condemned except for a bare few such as North Korea and Cuba.

Come what may, the internal insurrection in Myanmar has now become a full blown civil war, with up to some 14,000 fatalities to date over the last two years. These are people who had been mostly killed by the Tatmadaw, all of which have been clearly catalogued by the United Nations and the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London.

What makes Myanmar an albatross over the neck of Asean is the negative impression that it has given to Asean and the Asean Way, which Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia duly noted when he was in Thailand for a two-day visit during Feb 10 and Feb 11, 2023.

Anwar affirmed that while it is true that Asean does its utmost to practise non-intervention, matters within Myanmar have reached its zenith.

First and foremost, the 2,401km border between Thailand and Myanmar is not on a permanent state of alert; as is the 2,400km between Myanmar and China, the Comprehensive Strategic Partner (CSP) of Asean.

Myanmar's border with Laos and Bangladesh is another massive headache. Bangladesh's Cox's Bazaar, with close to 700,000 Rohingya refugees, has become a humanitarian redoubt with the lowest quality of life possible.

Secondly, the inability of the Tatmadaw to work with the NLD and up to 24 ethnic groups from a total of 55 of them have spawned serious problems of racial discrimination, resulting in genocidal warfare against the Rohingya Muslims in particular.

At any given time, there are 200,000 Rohingya Muslims in Malaysia with another five million employed with low skill sets also originating from Bangladesh and Myanmar. These are problems that the likes of Malaysia, Thailand and elsewhere that border Myanmar have had to deal with.

Thirdly, wracked by a Myanmar that is in total disarray, this has brought about the unavoidable odium to the name of Asean.

Instead of being seen as a regional organisation that is firmly principled in guiding Asean — in fact widely touted as the second most successful regional organisation after the European Union (EU) — Asean is now mired with endless problems.

Thus, the suggestion of suspending Myanmar from the membership of Asean, even if temporarily, should be given the utmost consideration; without which Asean would lose its strategic anchor and diplomatic culture, especially when Jakarta is the chair of Asean.


The writer is the President and Chief Executive Officer of EMIR Research, a think tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of the New Straits Times